
In summary, the main differences between a standard will and a conditional will include:
‣ Scope of validity: A standard will applies universally upon death, whereas a conditional will only applies if a specific event or condition is met (otherwise it’s as if you had no will for that circumstance).
‣ Reliability: Standard wills provide certainty that your wishes will be followed regardless of circumstances. Conditional wills introduce uncertainty – if the condition isn’t fulfilled exactly, your estate might end up distributed under intestacy or a prior will.
‣ Complexity and risk of dispute: Conditional language can lead to disputes or confusion over whether the condition was satisfied or how it should be interpreted. A traditional will with clear, unconditional instructions is usually more straightforward to execute and less prone to challenge.
‣ Flexibility: People sometimes consider conditional wills as a temporary measure (for example, effective during a short period of unusual risk). However, a safer approach in practice may be to make a normal will and then update or replace it later, rather than hinging your entire will on one event.
‣ Young Travellers and Adventurers: Consider a young adult about to embark on a round-the-world backpacking trip or gap year. They have never made a will (quite common – many people put off will-writing, especially at a young age). The impending travel, especially if it involves risky activities, might spur them to create a will. They may frame it as “I make this will to cover me if I die during this trip.” The conditional will here is meant as a safeguard for that journey only. If they return safely, they might intend to revoke or simply consider the will moot. This scenario is compelling as a story – the adventurer writing heartfelt wishes “just in case.” However, it’s worth noting that a standard will could accomplish the same protection without conditional wording, and the person could still change it later. Relying on a conditional clause like “if I don’t return” means if they do return and then, say, have a fatal accident a year later without updating the will, the previous conditional will might not apply at all. This could unintentionally leave their estate without a valid will, illustrating the risk of a conditional approach.
‣ Military Service and High-Risk Jobs: Members of the armed forces or others in dangerous professions often think about their mortality before deployments or missions. A soldier headed into active combat might write a will that is effective “if I am killed in action during this tour.” In fact, UK law even recognizes privileged wills for active service personnel – a special provision allowing soldiers or sailors to make a valid will under improvised conditions (even orally) due to the extreme circumstances. Many servicemembers carry informal “just in case” instructions. A conditional will in this context might provide specific wishes if the person dies during that service period. Again, the intention is usually to cover that particular danger. If the soldier survives and resumes normal life, they may plan to draft a new will or might have had a prior will to fall back on. The caution here is similar: if no new will is made later, and the person dies under different circumstances, a will that was conditional on dying in combat might not apply. It may be more effective for military personnel to have a regular will at all times (which they update before deployment) rather than one that only triggers in combat situations. Still, historically and emotionally, we understand why someone in harm’s way might opt for a condition like this as a form of solace.
‣ Serious Illness or Surgery: Another scenario is a person facing a life-threatening illness or major surgery. For example, someone diagnosed with a terminal illness might draft a will saying it’s to have effect “if my current illness leads to my death.” Or before a risky surgical operation, a patient might write, “In the event I don’t survive this surgery, this is my will….” Such wording makes the will’s operation contingent on that illness or procedure. The person’s reasoning could be that if they survive and recover, they might want to revisit their estate plan (or they assume the will isn’t needed unless the worst outcome happens immediately). Indeed, there was a real case where a woman wrote, “In the event that I don’t make it through surgery on [date]…” and then she did survive the surgery. She lived many years longer. When she eventually passed away, a dispute arose whether that document was a valid will (since the stated condition – dying in that surgery – did not happen). Such cases illustrate that conditional wills can create legal uncertainty. The courts may have to interpret whether the will was truly intended to be conditional or was just phrased that way out of caution. Generally, UK courts look for the testator’s intent. If it appears the person only intended the will to function for the surgery scenario, the will might be deemed conditional and ineffective for a later death. Here again, the safer route for someone in ill health is simply to make a clear will covering all possibilities (and update it as needed), rather than limiting its scope.
‣ Short-term coverage: If you genuinely need a will for a temporary high-risk period and intend to revoke or change it afterwards. For example, an individual who has never made a will might prefer to write a narrow will “just for” an upcoming event (trip, surgery, etc.), perhaps because they don’t feel ready to plan for the long term. The conditional will could provide psychological comfort that there’s a plan in place for that period.
‣ Specific event focus: If your estate distribution wishes would drastically differ depending on the event of your death. This is uncommon, but imagine a scenario: “If I die before my business sale is complete, I want X; but if I die after, I want Y.” Rather than one will trying to cover both, a conditional clause might be used. (Even in this case, though, estate planners would often handle it by writing a single will with alternative provisions, or simply updating the will when the event occurs.)
‣ Peace of mind for others: In some cases, a conditional will might be used to reassure family members. For instance, aging parents might say to a travelling child, “We’ve made a will that only kicks in if something happens to us on the same trip,” to alleviate the child’s worries. It’s more a gesture than a legal strategy, but it can have an emotional benefit.
‣ Risk of intestacy: The biggest drawback is the risk that the condition won’t be satisfied, leaving you with no valid will at all if you die in a different manner. UK intestacy laws would then determine who inherits your estate, which may not align with your wishes. For example, dying without a will means “certain rules dictate how the money, property or possessions should be allocated,” which may not be what you wanted. Unmarried partners, for instance, do not inherit under intestacy, which could be a huge problem if you intended your partner to benefit. A conditional will that fails could unintentionally disinherit loved ones. This risk often outweighs any perceived benefit of the conditional approach.
‣ Legal uncertainty and challenges: Adding conditions can invite ambiguity. Did the event occur or not? Is the will valid? Ambiguous wording or unforeseen circumstances could lead to litigation. A clause like “if I don’t return from this trip” might seem clear, but what constitutes “return”? (E.g., returning ill and dying shortly after?) If there’s any doubt, the executors or courts might have to get involved. Most people want their estate administration to be as smooth as possible for their family, without legal wrangles. A straightforward will is typically much safer on that front.
‣ Alternatives exist: Nearly everything a conditional will tries to achieve can be done in other ways. If you only want a will for a short term, you can still make a normal will now and then simply make a new will later to reflect changed circumstances (remember, wills are revocable and you can update them anytime). If you have distinct wishes based on different conditions, a well-drafted single will can include those scenarios or backup plans (for example, naming alternate beneficiaries, or using trusts that handle “what if” situations). In practice, estate planning professionals usually recommend using flexible trust provisions or just updating your will, rather than hanging the validity on a single condition.
‣ “I only need a will if I have a lot of assets or if I’m older.” This is a widespread misconception. In reality, every adult should consider making a will, regardless of age or wealth. If you die without one, the law’s default scheme takes over, and it may not reflect your wishes at all – for example, unmarried partners or close friends would get nothing by default. Don’t wait for a dangerous trip or a health scare to draft a will. Those situations can motivate you, but ideally, you have a will in place before such events. (You can always update it as life changes – making a will early does not mean it’s set in stone.) The best time to write a will is now, not only when confronting a conditional scenario.
‣ “A conditional will can cover me for now, and I’ll handle the rest later.” Be careful with this line of thought. While it’s true that any will is better than no will, a conditional will used as a stop-gap measure could give a false sense of security. If “later” never comes and your condition never materialises, your stop-gap will might not protect you at all. It’s usually better to create a comprehensive will now (even a simple one) than a very narrow conditional will. You can revise or replace your will in the future when you have time to plan more thoroughly – this is akin to updating your life plan as you age or as your circumstances evolve.
‣ “Including conditions in my will lets me control everything even after I’m gone.” It’s true that conditional gifts can allow some control (for instance, requiring an heir to reach a certain milestone to inherit). Many people like the idea of guiding how their gift is used – for example, giving funds only for education or requiring that an heir overcome an addiction before inheriting. UK law does permit reasonable conditions, and many wills and trusts make use of them responsibly. However, there are limits: overly restrictive or punitive conditions can backfire or be voided. Also, administering complex conditions can put a burden on your executors or trustees. The key is to keep any conditions clear, lawful, and in line with professional advice. And remember, a condition attached to a specific bequest is different from a condition on the whole will’s validity. The former is common; the latter (our “conditional will”) is far more precarious.
Instagram: @ZomiWealth
LinkedIn: Zomi Wealth
X (formerly Twitter): @ZomiWealth
Facebook: Zomi Wealth




Subscribe to our newsletter for exclusive tips, expert advice, and the latest updates from Zomi Wealth—delivered straight to your inbox.
“Zomi Wealth’’ is a trading name of Zomi Group Limited who are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), FRN 149309. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. An investor may get back less than the amount invested. Information on past performance, where given, is not necessarily a guide to future performance. The capital value of units in the fund can fluctuate and the price of units can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. The opinions and views expressed in this newsletter may not necessarily reflect the views of Zomi Group l Limited or its affiliates. The information provided in this newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation from any Zomi Group Limited entity to the recipient. Zomi Group Limited is not providing any financial, economic, legal, investment, accounting, or tax advice through this newsletter or to its recipient. Certain information contained in this newsletter constitutes “forward-looking statements,” and there is no guarantee that these results will be achieved. Zomi Group Limited has no obligation to provide any updates or changes to the information in this newsletter. Zomi Group Limited always recommends that the recipient take independent financial advice. Alternative investments often engage in leverage and other investment practices that are extremely speculative and involve a high degree of risk. Such practices may increase the volatility of performance and the risk of investment loss, including the loss of the entire amount that is invested. These investments are usually highly illiquid and generally not transferable without the content of the sponsor.
Investing in cryptocurrency is highly speculative and involves significant risk to capital, as its value is extremely volatile and can fluctuate widely in short periods. It is not regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, meaning investors may not have access to financial protections, including the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) or the Financial Ombudsman Service. There is also a risk of loss from fraud, cybersecurity breaches, or operational failures within cryptocurrency platforms. Investors should carefully consider whether they can afford to lose the entirety of their investment.
Know more about Zomi Wealth, how we invest, our plans and how to be a part of Zomi Wealth. Contact Us!